Special fields of psychology
| Категория реферата: Рефераты по психологии
| Теги реферата: курсовая работа по менеджменту, тезис
| Добавил(а) на сайт: Pimenov.
Предыдущая страница реферата | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Следующая страница реферата
Objective Personality Tests. These tests measure social and emotional
adjustment and are used to identify the need for psychological counseling.
Items that briefly describe feelings, attitudes, and behaviors are grouped
into subscales, each representing a separate personality or style, such as
social extroversion or depression. Taken together, the subscales provide a
profile of the personality as a whole. One of the most popular
psychological tests is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
(MMPI), constructed to aid in diagnosing psychiatric patients. Research has
shown that the MMPI may also be used to describe differences among normal
personality types.
Projective Techniques. Some personality tests are based on the phenomenon of projection, a mental process described by Sigmund Freud as the tendency to attribute to others personal feelings or characteristics that are too painful to acknowledge. Because projective techniques are relatively unstructured and offer minimal cues to aid in defining responses, they tend to elicit concerns that are highly personal and significant. The best-known projective tests are the Rorschach test, popularly known as the inkblot test, and the Thematic Apperception Test; others include word-association techniques, sentence-completion tests, and various drawing procedures. The psychologist’s past experience provides the framework for evaluating individual responses. Although the subjective nature of interpretation makes these tests particularly vulnerable to criticism, in clinical settings they are part of the standard battery of psychological tests.
Interpretation of Results
The most important aspect of psychological testing involves the interpretation of test results.
Scoring. The raw score is the simple numerical count of responses, such as the number of correct answers on an intelligence test. The usefulness of the raw score is limited, however, because it does not convey how well someone does in comparison with others taking the same test. Percentile scores, standard scores, and norms are all devices for making this comparison.
Percentile scoring expresses the rank order of the scores in percentages.
The percentile level of a person’s score indicates the proportion of the
group that scored above and below that individual. When a score falls at
the 50th percentile, for example, half of the group scored higher and half
scored lower; a score at the 80th percentile indicates that 20 percent
scored higher and 80 percent scored lower than the person being evaluated.
Standard scores are derived from a comparison of the individual raw score with the mean and standard deviation of the group scores. The mean, or arithmetic average, is determined by adding the scores and dividing by the total number of scores obtained. The standard deviation measures the variation of the scores around the mean. Standard scores are obtained by subtracting the mean from the raw score and then dividing by the standard deviation.
Tables of norms are included in test manuals to indicate the expected range
of raw scores. Normative data are derived from studies in which the test
has been administered to a large, representative group of people. The test
manual should include a description of the sample of people used to
establish norms, including age, sex, geographical location, and occupation.
Norms based on a group of people whose major characteristics are markedly
dissimilar from those of the person being tested do not provide a fair
standard of comparison.
Validity. Interpretation of test scores ultimately involves predictions
about a subject’s behavior in a specified situation. If a test is an
accurate predictor, it is said to have good validity. Before validity can
be demonstrated, a test must first yield consistent, reliable measurements.
In addition to reliability, psychologists recognize three main types of
validity.
A test has content validity if the sample of items in the test is representative of all the relevant items that might have been used. Words included in a spelling test, for example, should cover a wide range of difficulty.
Criterion-related validity refers to a test’s accuracy in specifying a future or concurrent outcome. For example, an art-aptitude test has predictive validity if high scores are achieved by those who later do well in art school. The concurrent validity of a new intelligence test may be demonstrated if its scores correlate closely with those of an already well- established test.
Construct validity is generally determined by investigating what psychological traits or qualities a test measures; that is, by demonstrating that certain patterns of human behavior account to some degree for performance on the test. A test measuring the trait “need for achievement,” for instance, might be shown to predict that high scorers work more independently, persist longer on problem-solving tasks, and do better in competitive situations than low scores.
Controversies. The major psychological testing controversies stem from two
interrelated issues: technical shortcomings in test design and ethical
problems in interpretation and application of results. Some technical
weaknesses exist in all tests. Because of this, it is crucial that results
be viewed as only one kind of information about any individual. Most
criticisms of testing arise from the overvaluation of and inappropriate
reliance on test results in making major life decisions. These criticisms
have been particularly relevant in the case of intelligence testing.
Psychologists generally agree that using tests to bar youngsters from
educational opportunities, without careful consideration of past and
present resources or motivation, is unethical. Because tests tend to draw
on those skills associated with white, middle-class functioning, they may
discriminate against disadvantaged and minority groups. As long as unequal
learning opportunities exist, they will continue to be reflected in test
results. In the U.S., therefore, some states have established laws that
carefully define the use of tests in public schools and agencies. The
American Psychological Association, meanwhile, continues to work actively
to monitor and refine ethical standards and public policy recommendations
regarding the use of psychological testing.
8. Development psychology
Developmental Psychology study of behavioral changes and continuity from infancy to old age. Much emphasis in psychology has been given to the child and to the deviant personality. Developmental psychology is particularly significant, then, in that it provides for formal study of children and adults at every stage of development through the life span.
Developmental psychology reflects the view that human development and behavior throughout the life span is a function of the interaction between biologically determined factors, such as height or temperament, and environmental influences, such as family, schooling, religion, and culture. Studies of these interactions focus on their consequences for people at different age levels. For example, developmental psychologists are interested in how children who were physically abused by their parents behave when they themselves become parents. Studies, although inconclusive, suggest that abused children often become abusive parents.
Other recent studies have focused on the relationship between the aging process and intellectual competence; contrary to the traditional notion that a person’s intellectual skills decline rapidly after the age of
55, research indicates that the decline is gradual. American studies of adulthood, building on the work of Erik Erikson, point to stable periods with a duration of 5 to 7 years, during which energy is expended on career, family, and social relationships, punctuated by
“transitional” periods lasting 3 to 5 years, during which assessment and reappraisal of major life areas occurs. These transitional periods may be smooth or emotionally stormy; the “midlife crisis” is an example of such a transition. Whether such transitions are the same for men and women, and whether they are universal, is currently under study.
9. Social psychology
Social Psychology branch of psychology concerned with the scientific study of the behavior of individuals as influenced, directly or indirectly, by social stimuli. Social psychologists are interested in the thinking, emotions, desires, and judgments of individuals, as well as in their overt behavior. An individual’s inner states can be inferred only from some form of observable behavior. Research has also proved that people are affected by social stimuli whether or not they are actually in the presence of others and that virtually everything an individual does or experiences is influenced to some extent by present or previous social contacts.
Development of Theory. Social psychology is rooted in the earliest intellectual probes made by individuals into their relations with society. Many of the major problems of concern to contemporary social psychology were recognized as problems by social philosophers long before psychological questions were joined to scientific method. The questions posed by Aristotle, the Italian philosopher Niccol
Machiavelli, the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes, and others throughout history are still asked, in altered form, in the work of present-day social psychologists.
The more recent history of social psychology begins with the publication in 1908 of two textbooks—each having the term social psychology in its title—that examine the impact of society on the development and behavior of individuals. One of these was written by the British psychologist William McDougall, and the other by the
American sociologist Edward Alsworth Ross. McDougall framed a controversial theory of human instincts, conceived of as broad, purposive tendencies emerging from the evolutionary process. Ross, on the other hand, was concerned with the transmission of social behavior from person to person, such as the influence of one person’s emotions on another’s in a crowd, or the following of fads and fashions.
Рекомендуем скачать другие рефераты по теме: контрольные работы по математике, реферат на тему понятие, сочинение по картине.
Категории:
Предыдущая страница реферата | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Следующая страница реферата