Quality of life and management of living resources
| Категория реферата: Рефераты по менеджменту
| Теги реферата: банк курсовых работ бесплатно, история возникновения реферат
| Добавил(а) на сайт: Вильгельмина.
Предыдущая страница реферата | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Следующая страница реферата
III.6. Project follow-up
In order for the Commission to verify the execution of the contract, participants are required to submit, via the co-ordinator interim and final
reports as well as reports of costs incurred.
These reports will be analysed by Commission services in the light of the
criteria, which led to the original selection of the proposal This will
ensure the project conforms to the conditions associated with the Community
financial contribution, and that the progress foreseen actually takes
place. The reports are also used to assess whether and in what manner the
project should continue to be supported.
In addition, and conforming to objectives stated in the Fifth Framework
Programme decision concerning the use and dissemination of results, the
Commission will follow-up the implementation of the results of the project.
Therefore participants are in general required to produce a “Technology
Implementation Plan” indicating how the knowledge gained will be used. The
Commission will ensure, where necessary, the confidentiality of these data.
III.7. Financial contribution of the Community
The Commission undertakes a financial contribution to the work.
With the exception of those cases where the Commission's contribution takes
the form of a lump sum payment, the Commission reimburses eligible costs
incurred by participants as the project progresses. Payment is made in
instalments at regular intervals.
III.7.1. Incurred eligible costs
Participants are required to identify and declare their eligible costs by
the submission of interim and final cost statements based on the actual
costs incurred for the execution of the project. Participants must retain
supporting documents, which justify these costs, for at least 5 years from
the end of each payment, to permit auditing by Commission services or other
institutions, e.g. the European Court of Auditors.
The different categories of costs that are eligible for Commission funding
differ according to type of contract (see Boxes 6 and 7).
III.7.2. Calculation methods
A number of different methods are used to calculate the Commission funding, depending on the type of action involved and on the participant’s capacity
to identify his incurred costs (see boxes 6 and 7).
For Research and Technological Development projects, Demonstration and
Combined Research and Demonstration projects, three calculation methods are
used: full cost actual overhead (FC), full cost flat rate (FF) and
additional cost (AC).
For Accompanying Measures, one calculation method is used for all
participants. The overhead may be calculated as a flat rate of the
personnel costs and in some cases no overheads may be allowed.
For technology take-up measures not all cost categories may be allowable.
For Concerted Actions and Thematic Networks, all participants use the
additional cost model (AC), so overheads are calculated as 20% of all
direct costs (except subcontracting).
Use of permanent staff is allowed for all types of organisations if
accurate time records are kept.
III.7.3. Payment of the contribution
The Community contribution is paid in Euro, in a number of regular instalments based on cost claims submitted by participants with their interim and final reports.
The Commission may make advance payments at the beginning of the project, contingent on verification of the participants’ financial standing. In certain circumstances the Commission may request financial or other guarantees to ensure the security of any advance payment made. This is particularly necessary for those shared-cost actions where the participants themselves are expected to support part of the cost.
III.8. Assistance available to proposers
The EC carries out a range of activities in support of potential proposers.
These vary as appropriate according to the nature of the Call and the
Specific Programme concerned. Therefore, they are detailed in the Guide
Part 2.
For each programme there is a network of National Contact Points in Member
and Associated States. The National Contact Points can be helpful to
organisations from their country in finding partners from other countries, and in assisting in procedural or administrative matters. There are a
number of other networks such as Innovation Relay Centres, Euro Info
Centres etc., which potential proposers may also consult.
The European Commission maintains an Infodesk for each programme of the
Fifth Framework Programme for the duration of their Calls. Any questions
concerning the Call not covered in this document nor in the material
available at the programme web site may be directed to the Infodesk, whose
address is included in the Call specific information in the Guide Part 2.
The Infodesk will post any last-minute information concerning the Call on
the programme website, which potential proposers should check periodically
for this reason.
The certification service provider has established an EU-wide support
network for proposers in the national languages. Details are given on the
web page relating to this service (http://www.fp5.csp.org).
The Commission may organise “Info-days”, to disseminate information about
the Fifth Framework or a particular Call, and also to provide an occasion
for proposers to meet potential consortium partners.
The Commission’s CORDIS server in Luxembourg (http://www.cordis.lu/fp5/)
offers a number of services and information sources which may be useful in
particular to support partner search activities. It also contains details
of organisations which have already expressed an interest in participating
to the different programmes under the Fifth Framework Programme.
In addition, the CORDIS website offers targeted information concerning both
implementation modalities of the specific programmes as well as financial
and administrative management aspects.
Box 3 - Co-operation with non-EU Countries and International Organisations
Opportunities for participation in proposal consortia
In planning a RTD proposal for submission to one of the programmes or to
the key action ‘Improving the socio-economic knowledge base’, researchers
should be aware that it is also open to participation by entities from non-
EU countries and to international organisations. The opening falls into
three categories and in all cases, the third country/international
organisation participant must be included as a participant in the original
proposal submitted:
(i) Countries associated to FP-5: For each of these countries, institutions
may participate and be funded, with similar rights and responsibilities to
EU Member State participants, once the Association Agreements come into
force (see box 4).
(ii) Project by project participation: This participation will be on a self-
financing basis and this option is open to all non-associated European
countries, to Mediterranean partner countries, to countries with which the
EU has an S&T Agreement, and to international organisations, as long as the
participation is in conformity with the interest of the Community.
(iii) All other countries: For countries not covered by the above
categories, participation in FP-5 projects on a self-financing basis will
be possible if the participation is in conformity with the interest of the
Community and is of substantial added value for implementing all or part of
the specific programme. The interest of the Community and the substantial
added value must be clearly indicated in the proposal.
The conformity with the interests of the Community will be assessed with particular regard to the contribution to one or more of the following (as laid down in Council Decision): the needs of other Community policies in support of which the RTD actions are carried out; providing appropriate incentives for maintaining and creating jobs in the Community; promoting sustainable development and improving the quality of life in the Community; strengthening the international competitiveness of Community industry; the existence of S&T co-operation agreements between the Community and third countries or international organisations.
Substantial added value may refer for example to cases where the third country participant is a generally recognised, top-level specialist in the field of the proposal or has access to unique resources which are of great importance to the project but which are not available in Europe, or where third country participant offers the prospect of opening new markets for the European participants.
In exceptional cases, Community financing for the third country participant or international organisation may be provided by the programme if it is essential for achieving the objectives of the project1, i.e. if the contribution of the participant cannot be provided by any other means and the project cannot be carried out without that participant.
For country groupings, see box 4
1 Additional rules are foreseen in the Specific Programme “Energy, environment and sustainable development” which provide for financial support to those entities where their participation is beneficial and offers added value for achieving the objectives of the Programme.
Рекомендуем скачать другие рефераты по теме: урок мира конспект, решебник по математике виленкин.
Категории:
Предыдущая страница реферата | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | Следующая страница реферата